Who we choose to lead our communities matters. With long appointments, politicians have the opportunity to make great positive change, but often fail to live up to expectations. Are we given poor choices or do people vote for candidates that are popular due to name recognition and flashy talking points alone?
Leadership is hard: political opposition can stifle plans, bureaucracy can prevent progress, and unexpected events such as pandemic or tragic events can create unexpected circumstances. So how do we consider who would excel at one of America’s most difficult jobs?
Here are some guidelines to help look past the name and evaluate the candidate across multiple factors. Consider how the candidates:
Understand New York City’s problems
Develop concrete plans to solve them
Discuss how their experience will allow them to accomplish their plans
Demonstrate strong character in the face of challenges.
But why should we care? Who has time to review the random fliers stuffed in our mail boxes? Will this next candidate really affect my life in any meaningful way? Do I have to do all the work to understand their policies and their affect on my community? How can you tell which plans are realistic and which are just empty promises?
The campaign hype cycle is chaotic. Therefore it is our goal to help you make sense of it all.
This quick guide will help you evaluate what candidates are actually offering. Over the next couple of weeks, OpenCitizen will gather and summarize the candidates’ policy proposals for you, but you will need to evaluate it. So let’s dive in and prepare for the upcoming democratic primary election.
Who do you think was New York City's best Mayor?Click a name to vote: |
Policy proposals are the "how" behind campaign promises—specific plans that outline goals, methods, funding sources, and timelines. Think of them as blueprints rather than wish lists. A good proposal explains not only what work will be done, but how it will be accomplished and paid for.
Has this proposal worked elsewhere?
Strong proposals often build on successful models from similar cities or include pilot programs to test new approaches. Be skeptical of "revolutionary" ideas with no track record.
Who's going to pay for it?
Every proposal needs a realistic funding source—whether it's reallocation of existing funds, new taxes, grants, or bonds. The math should add up.
Can the mayor actually do this?
The Mayor of New York City must work with the City Council, Agencies, and Departments as well as State and Federal Agencies to complete projects.
What's the timeline?
Complex issues rarely have quick fixes, and many proposals will require more time than the candidate will be in office. Realistic proposals acknowledge these timelines and include measurable milestones.
Who benefits—and who doesn't?
Every policy requires resources to be spent on a given problem. The trade offs of solving one problem will mean that another may go unaddressed. Good proposals tackle the most critical problems first, and consider impacts across different neighborhoods and demographic groups.
Vague language without specifics
Promises that require resources the city doesn't have
Solutions that don't address root causes
Proposals that ignore existing constraints or opposition
Too-good-to-be-true claims about solving complex problems quickly
OpenCitizen will gather the information needed to help you compare candidates' proposals more effectively. We will focus on specific plans rather than general goals, and consider each candidate's relevant experience and track record of implementation.
In local government, practical problem-solving often matters more than ideology. Our goal is to empower you and your vote.
The work continues after the November General Election. OpenCitizen will track progress through local news coverage, city council meetings, and neighborhood associations.
When promises aren't kept, they will be flagged and noted in the OpenCitizen Politician’s Timeline. External factors sometimes derail good plans, but patterns of unfulfilled promises may indicate a lack of commitment or capability.
You don't need political expertise to evaluate mayoral proposals, and it is worth spending time to understand the ideas and evaluate what is most interesting and important to you.
The best mayors combine ambitious vision with practical understanding of governance, funding, and community needs. By looking beyond campaign slogans to the substance of policy proposals, you can choose leaders who will actually deliver on promises that matter for your community.
Enjoying this publication?
Support this work by upgrading to a paid subscription!
Reply